1.No free equivalent exists that would effectively identify the article's subject.
2.The image does not in any way limit the ability of the copyright owners to market or sell their product.
3.The image is only used once and is rendered in low resolution to avoid piracy.
4.The image has been published outside Wikipedia; see source above.
5.The image meets general Wikipedia content requirements and is encyclopedic.
6.The image meets Wikipedia's media-specific policy.
7.The image is used in the article wiki-linked in the section title.
8.The image is significant in identifying the subject of the article, which is the film or film character itself.
9.The image is used in the article namespace.
10.The image has a brief description that identifies the image, notes the source, and provides attribution to the copyright holder.
Resolution:
The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification but lower resolution than the original. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, unsuitable as artwork on pirate versions or other uses that would compete with the commercial purpose of the original artwork.
Replaceable?:
As a film screenshot, the image is not replaceable by free content; any other image that shows the images from the film would also be copyrighted, and any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for identification or commentary.
Compatibility with wikipedia?:
Use of the film screenshot in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy and fair use under United States copyright law as described above.
请注意：我们的方针通常认为，对在世人物图像的合理使用如果只是为了展现其相貌，可以預期能够有自由版权的图像来代替它，而且这样的合理使用对于我们的这个维基百科项目并不恰当（见基金会的版权许可方针）。如果不是前述用途，则必须提供有利的证据来证明或者这个图像不仅仅是用来辨识其相貌，或者这个图像不可能用自由版权的图像来取代。第三方商业机构使用本圖时也须考虑是否侵犯当事人的人格权。